3 ms·
I sympathize with this a lot. At least for scientific articles, it usually helps if you're willing to spend enough time to familiarize yourself with the techni
by xelxebar 10y ago
I sympathize with this a lot.
At least for scientific articles, it usually helps if you're willing to spend enough time to familiarize yourself with the technical jargon. As a somewhat dated example, "Higgs particle evidence" will turn up lots of crappy new articles, but "CMS Higgs abundances" will immediately return high quality relevant results.
Of course, you have to figure out the right lingo int the first place, but usually you can mine arXiv/PubMed/etc for this kind of thing. Wikipædia usually has links to some kind of primary source.