5 ms·
> I wonder how this administration plans on dealing with it. That's a pretty bold assumption you're making in that statement.
by stouset 10y ago
> I wonder how this administration plans on dealing with it.
That's a pretty bold assumption you're making in that statement.
- huehehue 10y agofwiw I don't really see anything inflammatory in the parent's statement, or any indication that they feel the current administration is any more/less equipped than previous ones to deal with the water crisis.
- nothrabannosir 10y agoIt was a joke
- jacobolus 10y agoThe parent comment’s implication is that the administration does not have any plan for dealing with the problem. It was phrased in a sarcastic/jokey way, which doesn’t always read clearly on the internet.
- pharrlax 10y agoI wonder how you came to that conclusion. (I am not implying you did not come to that conclusion.)
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- stouset 10y agoTo be fair, his interpretation was my original intent. The "bold assumption" being that this administration has a plan or has any interest in developing a plan to deal with lead in thousands of municipalities' drinking water.
- Svexark 10y agoHow is it an assumption? The administration just gave $100M to help repair the pipes in Flint. It's in the title of the article. Also in the article is this quote from the administrator of the EPA: > especially focus on helping Michigan improve Flint’s water infrastructure as part of its larger goal of improving America’s water infrastructure.
- socialist_coder 10y agoThe Obama administration + Congress did that. Trump had nothing to do with it. From the 3rd paragraph of the article: > The funding was approved by Congress in December and signed into law by President Barack Obama, but the EPA had to review and approve a formal request from state officials detailing how the city intends to use the grant money.
- Svexark 10y ago> The Obama administration + Congress did that. Irrelevant. The quote I provided is from the current administrator of the EPA who was appointed by Trump.
- socialist_coder 10y agoActions speak louder than words. I wouldn't hold my breath for the current EPA to do anything but roll back regulations.
- cmurf 10y agoIt's an assumption that the current administration will deal with it at all. Consider its denialist position on climate change and the evisceration of the EPA budget, it's entirely reasonable to conclude lead elsewhere isn't a concern worth doing anything about. Besides, don't plutocrats drink only bottled water?