>When something is said to be "lacking", it implies that something should be there but isn't. I don't consider "lacking" to have that implication. Especially n

>When something is said to be "lacking", it implies that something should be there but isn't. I don't consider "lacking" to have that implication. Especially not in the context of the Oxford comma, as lack of an Oxford comma is well known to be a source of ambiguity(1). (1) https://theliteraryman.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/comma-comma.jpg https://theliteraryman.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/comma-com...