3 ms·
Well in order to be present they had to enter unlawfully. So pretty clear that it's illegal.
by muninn_ 10y ago
Well in order to be present they had to enter unlawfully. So pretty clear that it's illegal.
- dragonwriter 10y ago> Well in order to be present they had to enter unlawfully Wrong, you can be present unlawfully after completely lawful entry. > So pretty clear that it's illegal. Unlawful presence is obviously illegal, but it is not criminal. The two words do not mean the same thing.
- poikniok 10y agoBut you can't be present lawfully after unlawful entry, that is the point.
- dragonwriter 10y agoNo, the claim was "in order to be present they had to enter unlawfully"; that claim is what is under discussion and it is factually untrue. What you present is the converse of the claim under discussion. And, for that matter, is also false. A lawful permanent resident alien who enters (say, after a vacation abroad) other than at a designated border crossing is not unlawfully present, but has committed the offense of illegal entry.