It's not mistakes, it's clickbait title and false information. You want to make a distinction based on author's intention, but whether it is intentional or due

It's not mistakes, it's clickbait title and false information. You want to make a distinction based on author's intention, but whether it is intentional or due to incompentence fact is this citypages article got it wrong and got debunked in the ars technica article[1]: language in the warrant[2] that says "located in city or township of Edina, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota" is standard, pro forma language that is often contained in the county's warrants. That language, he said, does not mean that the warrant is demanding that Google solely disclose who within the city's 15 square miles searched for the victim's name, as some have reported.) [1]: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/03/judge-oks-warrant-to-reveal-who-searched-a-fraud-victims-name-on-google/ https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/03/judge-oks-warran... [2]: