4 ms·
This article has a lot of great points about private vs. open, but one I disagree with is "First, it's hard, if not impossible, to monetize private communicatio
by frederickcook 16y ago
This article has a lot of great points about private vs. open, but one I disagree with is "First, it's hard, if not impossible, to monetize private communication."
The obvious example that comes to mind here is Gmail. People still click on the targeted keyword ads next to their email, and I haven't seen that Gmail has started making anyone's email public yet.
That billion dollars Facebook made last year was mostly from those personalized display ads, which can easily target a person based on the ad profile of them facebook builds without anyone (read: the outside world) ever seeing their name/employer/statuses/etc. I can't imagine that the revenue from selling the status stream to Google for some multiple of $15 million comes close to the billion they're making from display ads, or the PR mess they've gotten themselves in.
- kylemathews 16y agoBut we have no clue (AFAIK) that Google makes a profit on Gmail, at least in the consumer market. Google Apps for Enterprise makes them some money but I think their main purpose is to disrupt existing players (cough MSFT cough).
- mark_l_watson 16y agoI find GMail ads more relevant than search ads and have spent more money in purchases from GMail ads. I am just one datapoint though, and Google probably will not publish relevant statistics.