5 ms·
It's a matter of value. There is nothing near 150k/mo of recurring revenue or sustainable value here. Edit: And even though it's not what I was saying, I don't
by purple-dragon 10y ago
It's a matter of value. There is nothing near 150k/mo of recurring revenue or sustainable value here.
Edit: And even though it's not what I was saying, I don't know why you think that kind of thinking is 'programmer think'. That's a bit disparaging to programmers, no? The ones I know aren't that shallow.
- Nadya 10y ago>There is nothing near 150k/mo of recurring revenue or sustainable value here. $1k/mo > Any $/mo > $0/mo >>>> Negative $/mo spent on hosting There are many people who would pay to use the code generated by this tool - even if it can be trivially grabbed via Inspect Element. It seems that's a common sentiment among posters on this topic - and I agree with them. It might seem silly to charge for 3-step keyframes (0->40->100 on many of them) with different timing functions but people will pay for just that.
- purple-dragon 10y agoSure they may pay, and that's believable—but I stand by my statement that it won't make much money.