To clarify, Moravec was speaking of robots, e.g. embodied computation. Moravec's paradox, though it now seems obvious, was the opposite of the prevailing view.

To clarify, Moravec was speaking of robots, e.g. embodied computation. Moravec's paradox, though it now seems obvious, was the opposite of the prevailing view. It implies that if 'being in the world' (mobility, perception & grasping) are the hard tasks then this is where AI will emerge not in simulation, planning or board games.