That seems like a poor example. Seatbelts are a measurable safety benefit to nearly every single person who drives or rides in a car. The deaf OR hard of heari

That seems like a poor example. Seatbelts are a measurable safety benefit to nearly every single person who drives or rides in a car. The deaf OR hard of hearing population of the united states is roughly 4.1% (10.6 million). A closer example would maybe be: if paraplegics needed special seatbelts to be safe in cars, should we mandate that all car makers be required to install special seatbelts that are paraplegic compatible? (Paraplegics make up a small fraction of the population of the United States - somewhere around 300,000). Obviously that comparison has holes in it as well, but it is a lot closer. And I would think the answer would be no, not because of heartlessness, but simply because it doesn't make sense. I assume, again not heartlessly, that most paraplegics do not drive. Likewise, most deaf people will not access these videos. It seems closer to insanity than reasonableness to mandate either of these things.