3 ms·
You're absolutely right, but they're the only thing designed to be. If they work the way they're intended, they kill everything.
by M_Grey 10y ago
You're absolutely right, but they're the only thing designed to be. If they work the way they're intended, they kill everything.
- TeMPOraL 10y agoWhile it doesn't take much away from the argument, it's worth noting that nuclear weapons, when they don't work the way they're intended, don't kill everything. Nuclear weapons are fail-safe[0], and it's very hard to make them detonate. A slight problem, and you have a very expensive dud. -- [0] - for "irradiated half the city, but at least it's still standing" values of safe.
- M_Grey 10y agoYes, that's one strong benefit they have over chemical weapons, which are basically always going to leak given time, or biological agents, which can be smuggled in a human incubator. The downside of nukes almost exclusively has to do with when they work as intended... otherwise they really are impressive products of engineering.
- Houshalter 10y agoDoes the nuclear material still react even if it doesn't explode? Like a nuclear reactor melting down.