4 ms·
WASM is going to make Rust [1] shine like nothing before. I love that all the Mozilla articles keep mentioning it together with C/C++. Unfortunately, writing R
by dawidloubser 10y ago
WASM is going to make Rust [1] shine like nothing before. I love that all the Mozilla articles keep mentioning it together with C/C++.
Unfortunately, writing Rust is an order of magnitude more difficult thatn writing ECMAScript, so hopefully it doesn't create a negative response from hordes of ES developers that want to check out this WASM thing.
But it's so much more suited than C/C++ (the other obvious candidates). In a nutshell, WASM is not really intended for higher-level languages with garbage collectors, etc. For that kind of work, I'd stick with ECMAScript.
[1] : https://www.rust-lang.org/ https://www.rust-lang.org/
- steveklabnik 10y agoThere's been a reasonable amount of success for JS programmers moving to Rust; npm is now using it for backend services, for example. There is a big semantic gap, but many don't find that insurmountable.