> ...performs poorly by whatever metrics you value... And there's the rub. You don't, and won't, have that information. To my knowledge there's one single sol

> ...performs poorly by whatever metrics you value... And there's the rub. You don't, and won't, have that information. To my knowledge there's one single solitary charity that provides adequate metrics to donors to support this kind of decision and for them it's on principle rather than to open up the market. Charities as a whole are simply not incentivised to share this kind of information because they compete for funds based on marketing, not efficiency, and there is currently no mechanism to change that. Yes, there are organisations that audit charities in small numbers and put them on approved lists, but you're still only getting a fading rubber stamp. > It is voluntary... He said, casually cutting the funds available for public infrastructure, welfare, health, education and the military by a couple of orders of magnitude.