Author here. > "He hasn't even heard the other side of the story and he's already coming up with conclusions" I tried pretty hard throughout the entire articl

Author here. > "He hasn't even heard the other side of the story and he's already coming up with conclusions" I tried pretty hard throughout the entire article to make it clear both that I was speculating, and that Uber will contest these claims in court. In the 'dead to rights' quote you referenced, my first three words were "From Waymo's filings". I am aware that Uber hasn't had a chance to respond, if I was to expand that sentence it would be something like: "If everything in Waymo's case is accurate, then they have a very comprehensive case to make against Levandowski stealing their LiDAR designs, based on forensic evidence as well as testimony and eyewitness accounts.