> indexes are LEB128s It's just a personal nit and beside the point of the (rather short) article, but I've long felt it sad that the more correct 'indices' is

> indexes are LEB128s It's just a personal nit and beside the point of the (rather short) article, but I've long felt it sad that the more correct 'indices' is so rare and the correct-but-inelegant 'indexes' is so very common.