The opportunity to ask the opinion of someone who saw research data is too much appealing. Given the fact that Monsanto manipulated and faked data in the past

The opportunity to ask the opinion of someone who saw research data is too much appealing. Given the fact that Monsanto manipulated and faked data in the past (http://www.williamsanjour.name/monsanto.htm http://www.williamsanjour.name/monsanto.htm), what's your stance on this study ? [1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15182708 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15182708 [2] http://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/44475050/Glyphosate-based_pesticides_affect_cell_20160406-2044-1yakakl.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1489602641&Signature=x6wV3BclexDnl6pIPlxEU8q%2FHjA%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DGlyphosate-based_pesticides_affect_cell.pdf http://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/44475050/Glyp... [3] http://www.cyberacteurs.org/sans_ogm/fichiers/boc0960245.pdf http://www.cyberacteurs.org/sans_ogm/fichiers/boc0960245.pdf Is this something serious or not? I've always wondered about the strength of the document.