Honestly I started out thinking this article was satirical, and I'm not at all convinced it's not now, but it's a bit difficult to tell around the author's prob

Honestly I started out thinking this article was satirical, and I'm not at all convinced it's not now, but it's a bit difficult to tell around the author's probably-non-native grasp of English. Everyone else seems to be treating it like it's serious though. Maybe I'm just too infused with the joy of Rust, Haskell and other such languages to think anything slightly hysterical-sounding about the utility of non-nullable types and the possibility of mutation by other threads can possibly be anything other than parody.