"Science only considers something to be "fact" or "true" when a large (and usually expensive) study has been conducted, the results have been peer reviewed, and

"Science only considers something to be "fact" or "true" when a large (and usually expensive) study has been conducted, the results have been peer reviewed, and the results are then published." If it hasn't or can't be replicated by and independent entity it's not good science. Peer-reviewed is simply not a high enough bar to consider something fact.