I'm not really sure what your point is, other than an apparently fervent desire to prove JWT's worth while speaking down to me. I didn't say that JWT couldn't d

I'm not really sure what your point is, other than an apparently fervent desire to prove JWT's worth while speaking down to me. I didn't say that JWT couldn't do that... You're the one who set up the strawman of untrusted parties, then gleefully knock it down after I address the issue. You have contributed no other valid feedback to my proposal, just a defense of JWT which is not an answer to anything I ever stated. I just want you to know that such tactics are not very appreciated from this side of the conversation. What does JWT provide that using bog-standard crypto primitives in the way I described doesn't? Other than a name and a standard?