Gruber fails to mention the obvious motivation behind this. Maybe because it's obvious. The point of the article is that breaking copy/paste, whatever the reas

Gruber fails to mention the obvious motivation behind this. Maybe because it's obvious. The point of the article is that breaking copy/paste, whatever the reason, doesn't work: "Who, when they paste such text and find this “Read more:” attribution line appended, doesn’t just delete it (and wonder how it got there)?"