3 ms·
You take my analogy too literally and interpreted it incorrectly. I could have used "crocheting" instead of "basketball" and the analogy would be just as stron
by vecter 10y ago
You take my analogy too literally and interpreted it incorrectly.
I could have used "crocheting" instead of "basketball" and the analogy would be just as strong.
From your incorrect interpretation, you made wildly false conclusions about my lying to others, pretending to be someone I'm not, and generally misrepresenting myself, as if you think that's what I do on my dates.
I've learned how to date women by building self confidence, learning tactics, and also just as importantly, understanding what women want at a deeply psychological level. What this results in is my making the right moves at the right times in the right way and advancing the ball forward appropriately. You can bet that I do this with women I'm attracted to, both physically and in terms of beliefs, values, and attitudes. This also means that I back off and move on when I realize that there is no mutual interest. Too many men chase after women who will never be interested in them, and that is a complete waste of time.
Everything you said after your first two sentences is completely false conjecture. If you believe that that's what learning to date women is about, then you are doing yourself the greatest disservice in the world.
- argonaut 10y agoStill doesn't make sense. You don't crochet by finding a weave that's compatible with your personality or whatever. You crochet by following correct technique and stitching.
- vecter 10y agoDating is a skill. You and your date can be greatly compatible, but as a guy, if you don't know how to move the ball forward, you two will never have the chance to enter an actual relationship. If you don't understand that there is skill in dating, then you probably don't understand dating.