4 ms·
There was some discussion of this on the CommonMark forums shortly after the initial release of CommonMark: https://talk.commonmark.org/t/commonmark-formal-gra
by eslaught 10y ago
There was some discussion of this on the CommonMark forums shortly after the initial release of CommonMark:
https://talk.commonmark.org/t/commonmark-formal-grammar/46 https://talk.commonmark.org/t/commonmark-formal-grammar/46
See in particular these comments by maradydd:
https://talk.commonmark.org/t/commonmark-formal-grammar/46/17 https://talk.commonmark.org/t/commonmark-formal-grammar/46/1...
https://talk.commonmark.org/t/commonmark-formal-grammar/46/22 https://talk.commonmark.org/t/commonmark-formal-grammar/46/2...
https://talk.commonmark.org/t/commonmark-formal-grammar/46/23 https://talk.commonmark.org/t/commonmark-formal-grammar/46/2...
I'm not sure they ever came to a conclusive answer (at least on this thread).
Edit: Here is JGM himself saying he doesn't know: https://talk.commonmark.org/t/commonmark-formal-grammar/46/33 https://talk.commonmark.org/t/commonmark-formal-grammar/46/3...
- Ericson2314 10y agoIf GitHub is normalizing comments anyways, I wonder they could have adopted a CFG. Overall this a step in the right direction but the whole saga is a perfect microcosm of our understructure cranking out pooly-understood stuff which comes back to bite us and cannot be tamed.
- nerdponx 10y agoInteresting. I wonder if there's a thesis in solving this problem.