2 ms·
You also have c) they had already released the videos, so now they need to follow the law and make them accessible. My personal feeling on this -- if the video
by derekp7 10y ago
You also have c) they had already released the videos, so now they need to follow the law and make them accessible.
My personal feeling on this -- if the videos were created as part of their primary mission, then they would be required to add accessibility. But it seems that these videos were a side effect of their primary mission, which is providing education to enrolled people. In that case, appropriate accommodations were most likely made in those specific classes, where needed.
- DanBC 10y ago> if the videos were created as part of their primary mission, then they would be required to add accessibility Even Berkeley said that all videos created must be accessible. They required people to sign off on that accessibility. https://news.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/2016-08-30-UC-Berkeley-LOF.pdf https://news.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/2016-08... > Prior to July 1, 2015, UC Berkeley also allowed faculty and instructors to design, develop and publish courses through a self-service model, which did not include support from BRCOE. Beginning July 1, 2015, UC Berkeley advised the Department that all faculty using the selfservice model will be asked to sign off on a list of accessibility resource reviews prior to publishing the course. The sign-off statements include: There's a list of statements saying things like "I have reviewed and implemented edX’s “Guidelines for Creating Accessible Content.”2"