3 ms·
That is a rational possible explanation. If that were the case, then (in answer to the article), one would need just one liberal view that the highly educated
by startupdiscuss 10y ago
That is a rational possible explanation.
If that were the case, then (in answer to the article), one would need just one liberal view that the highly educated can agree with (for instance, lower cost of higher education, lower debt on students), and then you would get the other views along with them.
- AnimalMuppet 10y agoNo, you'd need one liberal view that you vote on. That is, the one view that you hold as more important than all other views must be liberal.
- tracker1 10y agoOr, you are like me (Libertarian), and many others who believe that a minimalistic government that only meets the needs of common defense, upholding court decisions and essential infrastructure are best on a number of levels. Most of us are also in favor of VERY high levels of transparency in both government and businesses in order to establish fairly open trade. Most of us would prefer to see transactional taxes over income taxes. What consists of essential infrastructure is up to some debate, I might be convinced that education is, roads are, internet is (communications), electricity is... but not too much else. I feel that healthcare and other social welfare programs could lean towards family care requirements, which would allow for much lower costs for everyone else that doesn't have family for care. I'm not hardline either, I'm open to pragmatic options for many things... but the direction should be towards freedom and not away from it.