4 ms·
I don't disagree with your main parts, but this wasn't a "poorly implemented custom RF solution." This was a lightweight wireless protocol and system from TI,
by floatrock 10y ago
I don't disagree with your main parts, but this wasn't a "poorly implemented custom RF solution." This was a lightweight wireless protocol and system from TI, exactly designed for building relatively simple and cheap RF products.
In the same way that web developers grab Bootstrap and get a beautiful-enough site working out of the box, this company found a Bootstrap-for-wireless-communications framework and chip from TI.
What they didn't do is customize it for their needs (security-hardening) nor use any non-default configuration.
Point is, using a pre-built building-block component to speed up your go-to-market isn't inherently bad. In fact, you might even argue that an alarm company who rolled their own fly-by-night wireless protocol would raise more eyebrows.
- wyc 10y agoGood point. I wish we knew how to convince vendors to use secure defaults and actually care about their users' security. Public shaming seems to be one way that's working, so thanks for the post! :)