>>It gets way more complicated than that. After reading this kind of code for a few months, you get really good at parsing it. This must be how APL language us

>>It gets way more complicated than that. After reading this kind of code for a few months, you get really good at parsing it. This must be how APL language users feel parsing their ultra-terse syntaxes (includes J/K/Q variants). Seems most applicable to quant shops that still use kdb+.