5 ms·
I especially dislike the "let's make spotify, but on blockchain" approach the community has. They simply don't get that people won't switch over to their soluti
by ferologics 10y ago
I especially dislike the "let's make spotify, but on blockchain" approach the community has. They simply don't get that people won't switch over to their solution just because it's running ethereum blockchain.
- OJFord 10y agoAre you kidding? Who doesn't want an Uber for the Blockchain, where they can enter into a smart contract with their driver before getting into the vehicle?!
- flippyhead 10y agoI don't specifically want that. I don't not want it either.
- OJFord 10y agoPerhaps it wasn't clear, bit I was kidding :)
- warkdarrior 10y agoSon, on the Internet you need to close your <sarcasm> tag.
- yazaddaruvala 10y agoI've wanted that. Barring privacy, safety and quality concerns. If it is possible in ETH to build smart financial contracts but also encode state into the "wallet", such that reputation was earned or lost, then they really might have a winning strategy. There is no real reason why distributed Uber/Lyft shouldn't exist.
- Jabanga 10y agoI want that. Then it would be truly peer-to-peer. Where intermediaries are needed, the services the intermediaries offer can be debundled so that there's competition for the various services, driving fees down and quality up.