3 ms·
> Is the FN call overhead really that horrible in lodash? The overall size overhead is what is horrible. > Also, the transformed code (like all transformed ba
by 15155 10y ago
> Is the FN call overhead really that horrible in lodash?
The overall size overhead is what is horrible.
> Also, the transformed code (like all transformed babel) is most likely ugly and more verbose than using lodash's get, no?
Yes, but it also performs at what is probably as-close-to-optimal as possible. The resulting ternaries are extremely easy to work with for even the most basic of JS compilers. Source maps work well - I don't see this as a downside at all.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- jdd 10y agoNaw, Lodash is modular. You can cherry-pick its modules. It's less than 716 bytes (with lodash-webpack-plugin).