> which, of course, is unconstitutional Which means that you'd need only to amend the California constitution to repeal or modify that amendment. I'm with you

> which, of course, is unconstitutional Which means that you'd need only to amend the California constitution to repeal or modify that amendment. I'm with you in that I definitely do not favor violating a constitution of any sort, but because amendments are possible, we should not pretend that constitutions are set in stone, as they are amendable. We should also not attempt to pass policies that violate the constitution by methods other than amendment, of course.