> My second statement was highlighting how ones own opinion of oneself is not objective. And I retorted that ones own view of oneself can not be extrapolated o

> My second statement was highlighting how ones own opinion of oneself is not objective. And I retorted that ones own view of oneself can not be extrapolated onto the population at large if it is not objective. But I should have been clear, when I mean "second statement" I mean so inside my own post. Ex: 1st Statement: "People," in this context, isn't defined either. If however we were to say that by "people" you mean millennials, then you would be wrong." 2nd Statement: "But if you meant "the population at large" you would be correct." Which was in defense of the tech-literate and the young, but after researching some more my statements were based on old information. The only people that come to mind who are easily susceptible to ads are the old and tech-illiterate, i.e those who don't have much experience with ads. Though this is just conjecture.