3 ms·
A trivial answer would be; through systems overseen by elected representatives, roughly the same system that allocates state resources in the U.S.. There's mor
by maxander 10y ago
A trivial answer would be; through systems overseen by elected representatives, roughly the same system that allocates state resources in the U.S.. There's more to be allocated, and allocating resources correctly becomes vastly more important, but the problem is the same.
- altstar 10y agoAny place you can point to where this was implemented and works or worked?
- maxander 10y agoThe Scandinavian socialist countries are a step in the right direction, but no, not really. To some degree, this is because communism is a new idea that has had relatively few chances at implementation, and their implementors were either immediately corrupt or had undue faith in themselves. But also because there are fairly major unsolved problems with letting elected representatives manage resources, as abundantly demonstrated by capitalist democracies. And likewise, there are manifest (social) problems with letting corporations manage resources; humanity has yet to find a solution for governing that reliably "works," IMHO.
- altstar 10y agoThe Scandinavian countries are not socialistic. The means of production and ownership of capital is still in private hands.
- testrun 10y agoIf you think the problem is the same you simply have no clue.