3 ms·
The word was 'forced'. You defended it. C'mon yourself. Speculating what people might be doing, especially when it sounds plausible, then presenting it as fact
by mseebach 10y ago
The word was 'forced'. You defended it. C'mon yourself.
Speculating what people might be doing, especially when it sounds plausible, then presenting it as fact, is exactly fake news.
- ceejayoz 10y agoMy post literally stated (now edited to add "the headline is misleading / clickbaity" to be even more crystal-clear on that point) that they're not technically forced.
- mseebach 10y agoI understand, and I understood before. You're defending the lie by saying that it's only technically incorrect. You do understand that the phrase means that you think it's still substantially correct -- not that it conceivably could be true?
- ceejayoz 10y agoI believe it is substantially correct that Uber and companies like it engage in ethically dubious and legally murky anti-union actions. I believe it implausible that Uber didn't consider the pressure/intimidation aspect that a daily prompt to listen to their propaganda entails when adding it to the system.