3 ms·
And they are also obligated to defend the accuser right? Your arguments are very one sided; makes me think you just dislike unions.
by andy_ppp 10y ago
And they are also obligated to defend the accuser right? Your arguments are very one sided; makes me think you just dislike unions.
- Symmetry 10y agoWell, they're obligated to prevent the accuser from losing their job from making the accusation. The accuser probably wants more than that, however. My understanding is that in many countries other than the US unions are legally allowed to do the sort of self-policing of their members that would help in this case. The law exists because historically many non-socialist unions in the US formed part of the bulwark of segregation and had to be prevented from finding ways to kick non-white members out.
- 013a 10y agoUnions are obligated to protect jobs. In this situation, the perpetrator's job is at stake, but the victim's job is not.