3 ms·
use static html with a cdn or something like s3. it's probably cheaper, has basically no operational overhead, you don't really have to worry about being overwh
by kbar13 10y ago
use static html with a cdn or something like s3. it's probably cheaper, has basically no operational overhead, you don't really have to worry about being overwhelmed by traffic.
- enneff 10y agoNone of that is even necessary for text-based content if you just use an efficient web server (that's most of them, today) and static content. If you have a lot of large media files (not the case here) it's another story.
- kbar13 10y agoyeah but using a hosted service gives you the freedom of not spending time running a webserver