In part three he brilliantly draws a distinction between the objective sciences and others and subtly, if I'm understanding correctly, critiques a proponent of

In part three he brilliantly draws a distinction between the objective sciences and others and subtly, if I'm understanding correctly, critiques a proponent of uncontrolled population grown by pointing out that the proponents degree from the same university is not a degree in "mathematics, in science, nor in engineering". Feynman made explicit observations on this topic, quite critical ones, if I remember right.