Sure, but that analysis only matters if they'd been found to owe fiduciary duties. As I understand it, there are two distinct conclusions. One, they did not o

Sure, but that analysis only matters if they'd been found to owe fiduciary duties. As I understand it, there are two distinct conclusions. One, they did not owe fiduciary duties, as discussed above. Two, even if they did owe these duties, they didn't breach them. Bear in mind, they would have won even if the court found against them on point two.