3 ms·
It was the first thing that leaped out at me too, and truthfully if it had been followed with a stellar article it would have been merely annoying. Instead we w
by M_Grey 10y ago
It was the first thing that leaped out at me too, and truthfully if it had been followed with a stellar article it would have been merely annoying. Instead we were treated to exactly what you're expect from someone who can't edit a headline.
As an article, it's just a massive clot of claims presented without art or style, and certainly nothing like good evidence. It's intellectually, substantially, and systematically lazy.