2 ms·
Yes, you're not the only one to see this problem, but it's not as commonly understood as it should be. I've long desired for a formal semantics for CSS for exa
by tannhaeuser 10y ago
Yes, you're not the only one to see this problem, but it's not as commonly understood as it should be.
I've long desired for a formal semantics for CSS for example (but I believe flexbox is a step in the right direction in this regard).
If we're heading into a p2p future, my opinion is we're going to have to build it on web (HTML/CSS) technology for being able to leverage browser efforts, and for cross web/postweb publishing.
And I believe the prospect for doing this, from a pure technical PoV, is quite good. While I'm not completely agreeing with everything they do, WHATWG have succeeded in spec'ing a reasonably declarative and rich document language that doesn't need JavaScript for each and everything.
OTOH, more and more CSS ad-hoc syntax, and entirely new procedural web runtimes (cough WebAssembly cough) should be resisted.