3 ms·
From your example what I could understand is that browsers are not doing what you prefer, so you call them "feature lacking". For the specific case of your exa
by fiatjaf 10y ago
From your example what I could understand is that browsers are not doing what you prefer, so you call them "feature lacking".
For the specific case of your example I prefer the current browser behavior. So what?
- keypress 10y agoPerhaps it wasn't the best example, as the Tab/Window title could fall under Window management. But fine, if you just want minimal chrome, perhaps Chrome will do. Parent said feature-rich. My point really is that there are technical and usability features. And while of course there is cross over - I don't see much in the way of advancement in usability (without extensions). Browser's haven't changed that much in the last ten years - from an end users perspective. Window and web page management isn't great.