Objects are useful. But shouldn't define an entire application unless it's useful to do it that way. In an enormous number of cases it's a better idea to use so

Objects are useful. But shouldn't define an entire application unless it's useful to do it that way. In an enormous number of cases it's a better idea to use something else. So, yes. OOP, being that absolutely everything needs to be an object is absurd and failed. But the people who take it the other direction and say nothing should be an object are just writing even more complicated, more difficult to reason code. Use tools as tools and drop the ideologies, for a happier and brighter world.