3 ms·

The first word in the award: Disobedience.

2muchcoffeeman 10y ago
That's just stupid. The award is clearly for people who are being disobedient for the benefit of society. Breaking rules for the sake of breaking rules is just anarchy or trolling. You're just inconveniencing people who set out to recognise real contributions to society. Unless there is an Aaron Schwartz foundation or something, nominate people who are still doing work.
- Mithaldu 10y ago
  He has parents. It's the least they deserve in form of apology.
- oopsietazer 10y ago
  This isn't about Aaron. It's about the next person who downloads too much free stuff doing it emboldened by the thought that MIT will have their back when the feds come knocking. If only because not doing so costs MIT 250 thousand dollars. That would be a much bigger contribution to society than any one person walking away with this award.
  - newjersey 10y ago
    While we are on this topic, let's not forget the real culprits: cfaa and widespread abuse of discretionary power by prosecution. We must repeal (and not replace) the cfaa. Of course, we should name and shame MIT at every junction (shame on you, MIT!) However, we shouldn't lose sight of the bigger picture. CFAA is evil.
    - codewiz 10y ago
      Joi Ito, Director of the Media Lab, highly praised Aaron during the memorial held at the Media Lab in 2013: http://tech.mit.edu/V133/N12/swartz.html http://tech.mit.edu/V133/N12/swartz.html Perhaps the rest of MIT deserves shaming, but please don't punish the Media Lab.
  - clintonb 10y ago
    > It's about the next person who downloads too much free stuff doing it emboldened by the thought that MIT will have their back when the feds come knocking. Aaron Swartz was not an MIT affiliate, alum, faculty, or student. MIT had no obligation to "have [his] back" for violating MIT network policy and federal law.
    - AnthonyMouse 10y ago
      > Aaron Swartz was not an MIT affiliate, alum, faculty, or student. MIT had no obligation to "have [his] back" for violating MIT network policy and federal law. Having "no obligation" to do something is never an excuse for any behavior.
  - 2muchcoffeeman 10y ago
    > This isn't about Aaron. It's about the next person who downloads too much free stuff doing it emboldened by the thought that MIT will have their back when the feds come knocking. If only because not doing so costs MIT 250 thousand dollars. The next person? There are people CURRENTLY downloading free stuff and sharing it. Nominate an appropriate person. Vote for someone who really deserves it NOW. Show these people that we support civil disobedience when it benefits society. Take the fucking money. At this point, I have to believe that the people who want to flood them with ineligible nominees are simply trolling HN and trolling the MIT Media Lab. You guys are potentially throwing away 250K for no real reason. Also from the page > Both individuals and groups are eligible to win the prize.

That's just stupid. The award is clearly for people who are being disobedient for the benefit of society. Breaking rules for the sake of breaking rules is just anarchy or trolling. You're just inconveniencing people who set out to recognise real contributions to society. Unless there is an Aaron Schwartz foundation or something, nominate people who are still doing work.

Mithaldu 10y ago
He has parents. It's the least they deserve in form of apology.
oopsietazer 10y ago
This isn't about Aaron. It's about the next person who downloads too much free stuff doing it emboldened by the thought that MIT will have their back when the feds come knocking. If only because not doing so costs MIT 250 thousand dollars. That would be a much bigger contribution to society than any one person walking away with this award.
- newjersey 10y ago
  While we are on this topic, let's not forget the real culprits: cfaa and widespread abuse of discretionary power by prosecution. We must repeal (and not replace) the cfaa. Of course, we should name and shame MIT at every junction (shame on you, MIT!) However, we shouldn't lose sight of the bigger picture. CFAA is evil.
  - codewiz 10y ago
    Joi Ito, Director of the Media Lab, highly praised Aaron during the memorial held at the Media Lab in 2013: http://tech.mit.edu/V133/N12/swartz.html http://tech.mit.edu/V133/N12/swartz.html Perhaps the rest of MIT deserves shaming, but please don't punish the Media Lab.
- clintonb 10y ago
  > It's about the next person who downloads too much free stuff doing it emboldened by the thought that MIT will have their back when the feds come knocking. Aaron Swartz was not an MIT affiliate, alum, faculty, or student. MIT had no obligation to "have [his] back" for violating MIT network policy and federal law.
  - AnthonyMouse 10y ago
    > Aaron Swartz was not an MIT affiliate, alum, faculty, or student. MIT had no obligation to "have [his] back" for violating MIT network policy and federal law. Having "no obligation" to do something is never an excuse for any behavior.
- 2muchcoffeeman 10y ago
  > This isn't about Aaron. It's about the next person who downloads too much free stuff doing it emboldened by the thought that MIT will have their back when the feds come knocking. If only because not doing so costs MIT 250 thousand dollars. The next person? There are people CURRENTLY downloading free stuff and sharing it. Nominate an appropriate person. Vote for someone who really deserves it NOW. Show these people that we support civil disobedience when it benefits society. Take the fucking money. At this point, I have to believe that the people who want to flood them with ineligible nominees are simply trolling HN and trolling the MIT Media Lab. You guys are potentially throwing away 250K for no real reason. Also from the page > Both individuals and groups are eligible to win the prize.