3 ms·
i got confused at first too. its evidence that the 1930s was the golden age of chocolate, not an explanation of why the 1930s are the golden age of chocolate
by autokad 10y ago
i got confused at first too. its evidence that the 1930s was the golden age of chocolate, not an explanation of why the 1930s are the golden age of chocolate
- dragonwriter 10y agoLots of "why X is Y" articles are really "why X is described as Y" rather than "what caused X to be Y".
- n4r9 10y agoThe confusion is compounded by one of the first lines: > this extract ... explains why the decade produced virtually all the classic bars we still love today