3 ms·

Am I the only one who came away with more appreciation of the "what", but none at all of the "why"?

• autokad 10y ago
  i got confused at first too. its evidence that the 1930s was the golden age of chocolate, not an explanation of why the 1930s are the golden age of chocolate
  • dragonwriter 10y ago
    Lots of "why X is Y" articles are really "why X is described as Y" rather than "what caused X to be Y".
    • n4r9 10y ago
      The confusion is compounded by one of the first lines: > this extract ... explains why the decade produced virtually all the classic bars we still love today