4 ms·
Then he should call it, "a culture of no surprises and collective problem solving." Calling it "no excuses" is part of the management problem he has identified.
by getpost 10y ago
Then he should call it, "a culture of no surprises and collective problem solving." Calling it "no excuses" is part of the management problem he has identified.
My experience is, there are often other dimensions to the issue of commitment.
There is a conscientiousness that comes from being an owner of a company. It's rare to have an employee who maintains the same level of attention as an "owner." That's just how things are. Demanding that employees increase their attention to their work won't change this, or at least not for long. As the article suggests, you can work on developing a culture where people are more likely to be forthcoming and cooperative, but that only goes so far.
There are some employees who do attend to their work the way an owner would, often to their own detriment. Overwork is a real problem for their own wellbeing, and their overall ability to grow and change. It can be a problem for the employer as well, for lots of reasons, including an over-reliance on a few key people.
You can make sure that everyone has enough of a stake to consider themselves an owner, as in a co-op, but co-ops don't seem to scale. That's fine for plenty of businesses, but not for the kinds of businesses that venture capital wants to invest in.
EDIT: The clip art illustrating the article, Pinocchio, suggests a moral element in the author's world view, it conflates lying with missing deadlines and making excuses and not keeping people informed. If people are lying to you as a manager, you should ask yourself why.
- cj 10y agoAgree with renaming the article (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13846741 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13846741) - but I'm glad Blank posted this rather than not posting for fear of HN attacks for not wording things perfectly. > There is a conscientiousness that comes from being an owner of a company. The examples Blank uses in his article is VP-level (highly paid, large equity grants, etc). I think a lot of people are interpreting his advice in the context of someone who isn't managing people. > It's rare to have an employee who maintains the same level of attention as an "owner." Agree. But if you are a manager, you are the "owner" (and responsible) for the work of your direct reports.
- rhizome 10y agoThe examples Blank uses in his article is VP-level (highly paid, large equity grants, etc). I think a lot of people are interpreting his advice in the context of someone who isn't managing people. Ahistorical and naive. If a VP in this organization thinks they might fall under the blade of "no excuses," he will sacrifice any number of his "isn't managing people" people.
- someguydave 10y agoThere is another case - where an employee really cares about the company and percieves some risk or problem. If he brings up the issue and it is either ignored or dismissed it causes the employee to become more cynical about the management.