3 ms·

So yeah, it looks like this ruling will prevent any commodity linked ETF from being approved without surveillance on a regulated exchange. So that's not likely

So yeah, it looks like this ruling will prevent any commodity linked ETF from being approved without surveillance on a regulated exchange. So that's not likely not gonna happen ever. The ruling kills any other bitcoin/virtual asset ETF from getting approved as well.

omouse 10y ago
without surveillance on a regulated exchange So we're going to have competition in exchanges, a free market of them with various rules/surveillance levels? Neat!
- JumpCrisscross 10y ago
  Competition between exchanges based on rules (e.g. paying liquidity takers versus makers) and surveillance (e.g pits versus dark pools or tape delays) has existed for a long time (think: American Stock Exchange versus NYSE versus NASDAQ) [1]. It sped up after the SEC passed Reg ATS [2]. [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_trading_system https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_trading_system [2] https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/242.301 https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/17/242.301