2 ms·
The source in that image from Tesla are extremely suspicious. A Google search for "IIT Takeshita" gives you only that image. Further research took me to this pa
by owenversteeg 10y ago
The source in that image from Tesla are extremely suspicious. A Google search for "IIT Takeshita" gives you only that image. Further research took me to this page. http://www.iit.co.jp/ http://www.iit.co.jp/, where I got the plain text "I'm sorry. It is under construction. Please wait."
By the way, your own sources contradict each other - even if you _do_ believe that image from Tesla, the Gigafactory's completed capacity is 35 GWh/yr. This blog post states the same [0]. The segment which is done is cool, but it is surrounded by construction equipment and I doubt it is producing very many cells.
Finally, since I doubt you're in the battery industry, there are two very important numbers: production capacity and production. For example, 2014 worldwide production capacity was almost 30 GWh, but worldwide production was only 5.4 GWh [1]. This is due to a lot of factors, but ultimately only a fraction of manufacturing capacity is used at any given time. A lot of graphs that you see on blogs will conflate the two.
[0] https://www.tesla.com/blog/battery-cell-production-begins-gigafactory https://www.tesla.com/blog/battery-cell-production-begins-gi...
[1] http://evobsession.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/image-23-e1461122689735.jpg http://evobsession.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/image-23-e...
- schiffern 10y ago>The source in that image from Tesla are extremely suspicious. A Google search for "IIT Takeshita" gives you only that image. It's not easy to find, but I did some digging. Looks like an analysis of the global battery industry, with the 2013 version presented at the 2013 Battery Japan conference.[1] From other citations I found[2][3] it's clear the speaker is Hideo Takeshita, who in 2001 was the vice president of IIT (the Institute of Information Technology Ltd.)[4] and in 2014 was the president of a battery market research firm called B3 Corporation.[5] Sure the document isn't freely available online, but given the commercial nature of the content that hardly seems suspicious. >your own sources contradict each other Sorry, I should have been more clear. It gets very confusing since it's a moving target, and you can rarely tell who is using what source (and when that source is from). The original capacity announced in their blog post[6] on 2014-02-26 was 35 GWh/yr at the cell level and 50 GWh/yr at the pack level (importing 15 GWh/yr of cells).[7] That's what you're seeing on the chart. Later at the 2016 shareholder meeting on 2016-05-31, Tesla CEO Elon Musk announced that they were going to triple the final production capacity at the Nevada Gigafactory.[8] [1] https://web.archive.org/web/20130207162628/http://www.batteryjapan.jp/en/Home/ https://web.archive.org/web/20130207162628/http://www.batter... [2] http://www.sdle.co.il/AllSites/810/Assets/c%20pillot-avicenne.pdf#42 http://www.sdle.co.il/AllSites/810/Assets/c%20pillot-avicenn... (page 42) [3] http://www.avem.fr/docs/pdf/AvicenneDiapoXining.pdf#21 http://www.avem.fr/docs/pdf/AvicenneDiapoXining.pdf#21 (page 21) [4] http://electronicdesign.com/energy/li-ion-batteries-reach-higher-performance http://electronicdesign.com/energy/li-ion-batteries-reach-hi... [5] http://wardsauto.com/miscellaneous/battery-experts-seek-lower-costs-better-technology http://wardsauto.com/miscellaneous/battery-experts-seek-lowe... [6] https://www.tesla.com/blog/gigafactory5 https://www.tesla.com/blog/gigafactory5 [7] https://www.tesla.com/sites/default/files/blog_attachments/gigafactory.pdf https://www.tesla.com/sites/default/files/blog_attachments/g... [8] http://electrek.co/2016/05/31/tesla-triple-battery-output-gigafactory-1-150-gwh-elon-musk/ http://electrek.co/2016/05/31/tesla-triple-battery-output-gi...