3 ms·
> How do you address this with policy? The same way we should be addressing inequality right now. How _will_ we address this with policy? The same way we alrea
by jbreckmckye 10y ago
> How do you address this with policy? The same way we should be addressing inequality right now.
How _will_ we address this with policy? The same way we already do: meaning that we do not, and in fact are thrall to an army of lobbyists and interest groups who would have us believe this inequality is not just necessary but in fact morally redeemable.
- antisthenes 10y agoThat just means you have bigger problems than a few genetically enhanced humans running around. Which is, in fact, already happening without genetic enhancement: the Olympics are a pretty much a display of peak human genetic fitness, and no one loses their mind about it. What would be a problem: genetically enhanced humans reach some critical mass and decide to purge the non-enhanced ones à la Eugenics wars in Star Trek (purely hypothetical)
- nanistheonlyist 10y agoI do not understand how this is a problem. Genes that are beneficial are propagated. Genes that are detrimental are eliminated. Nature divines which is which by survival of the fittest. I want future humanity to have the best genes possible. How else will we fight off the robots?