4 ms·
"I don't really find VS Code to be any slower than VS." Given VS Code has a fraction of the features VS has, it should be noticeably faster. It will eventually
by jasonkostempski 10y ago
"I don't really find VS Code to be any slower than VS."
Given VS Code has a fraction of the features VS has, it should be noticeably faster. It will eventually be GB of bloat and slower than VS.
What I'd like to see instead is features being broken out into separate components that can be used by any other editor/tool. Of course, if every component is going to required it's own dot file in my home directory to (maybe) turn off telemetry, I won't touch it, so I'd rather see those things developed by someone other than MS.
- lsadam0 10y agoVS Code does break off features into separate components. This is what I'm referring to when I say "build the experience I want".
- MichaelGG 10y agoThe editor is noticeably laggy on my Xubuntu VM. Emacs/vim are speedy, as is VS on the host.
- tracker1 10y agoYou have a very different experience with VS than I have... right now, I'm waiting half an hour, so I can check out a branch from vsts, so I can wait another 6-8 minutes to build my solution, etc... it's painfully slow... VS Code, edit, next... I've only seen VS Code run slow if you're running on 2gb of ram, or have hundreds of competing plugins installed, and even then. VS Code is way better than VS proper from my own subjective experience.