4 ms·
Yep pretty much. Can a publisher choose who caches his result, and pick the ones that give him the best deal money wise? Otherwise, Google turned into a booksto
by batmansmk 10y ago
Yep pretty much. Can a publisher choose who caches his result, and pick the ones that give him the best deal money wise?
Otherwise, Google turned into a bookstore with a printer in the back and no way for the publishers to trust the reseller.
- callahad 10y agoI don't believe so. Google's AMP Cache is opportunistic with no opt-out for valid AMP pages. Further, according to the AMP Cache Guidelines at https://github.com/ampproject/amphtml/blob/master/spec/amp-cache-guidelines.md https://github.com/ampproject/amphtml/blob/master/spec/amp-c..., > In the AMP ecosystem, the platform that links to content may freely choose which AMP Cache (if any) to use. It is an inversion of the typical model where content delivery is the responsibility of the publisher.