4 ms·
>it stand to reason that a worker can produce only so much work per day before stressing out, and if an employee hired for 8h does 4h more on the side as contra
by zaptheimpaler 10y ago
>it stand to reason that a worker can produce only so much work per day before stressing out, and if an employee hired for 8h does 4h more on the side as contractor the employing company gets 'cheated out' of productive time and this is especially true in a job that require fairly constant concentration, even if being tired at the job is shitty all around universally.
Even if there is truth to what you said, employers already have enough power as it is. Why should we let them own a workers time even outside of the hours they are being compensated? They have no right to that. At the end of the day, if a worker is not productive enough the company can choose to fire them - thats about all the say a company should have over your life. If they want to OWN ALL your productive output, it stands to reason they should pay much more than the 8 hours your salary covers.
- LoSboccacc 10y ago> Why should we let them own a workers time even outside of the hours they are being compensated? I think it's more "let them have the power to fire a worker that comes on the job tired, warms the seat while recovers for the night shift and leaves the office without producing the value he is paid for." more to the point: there's already a contract form that empowers the worker to work goals instead of hours, allowing employers that so desire to manage their time, so there's that as well. if one chooses the salaryman life, he get pros and cons.
- TheCoelacanth 10y agoFire them, sure. Let them sue the employee to capture the value they produced on their own time, no.