3 ms·
Whats the rationale for banning even one? Were there any actual threats? There were certainly no attacks by immigrants/refugees from those countries. According
by redditmigrant 10y ago
Whats the rationale for banning even one? Were there any actual threats? There were certainly no attacks by immigrants/refugees from those countries.
According to you we should wait for things to reach peak bigotry before reacting. Would you have the same "oh no big deal" reaction if a single Christian country was banned mainly for being christian?
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- discombobulate 10y agoI don't think it's necessary to exaggerate the facts of the matter to argue against the policy. If anything, a falsehood weakens the position of the person making the argument. It's easier to defend the truth. It's more robust.